Gays In The Military

Posted by 9iron on 02/02 at 02:38 PM

Today our Secretary Of Defense sets out to explain just how he is to go about and terminate the current ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy prevalent in today’s military.  Americans now will line up on both sides of the issue and ‘experts’ will abound as talking heads extolling their points of view.

As with all things political, the real cost of this change (if that’s what it’s to be), that being of combat readiness is certainly to be overlooked.  Just as in my day, unit cohesiveness can only be measured subjectively by local leaders/commanders.  The degree to which openly gay individuals affect readiness will vary from unit to unit, small unit that is. 

Politicians and policy makers tend to believe that in order to effect a specific change such as this merely requires them simply saying that it is so.  They do not understand the implications of their edict, for most have never ‘been there’ and for those who have, it’s been so long that their recollection bears little, if any, resemblance to reality.  Our President made this declaration, and thus our Defense Secretary has his marching orders.  Hopefully, Mr Obama was not just fulfilling a campaign promise to a special interest group, but is genuine in his belief that our Armed Forces need this change. 

The decision to do this will have serious complications in recruitment, retention, readiness, and even discipline.  Will those same young men and women from the Heartland still enlist at sustainable numbers?  Will those trained and ready veterans elect to reenlist in adequate numbers to maintain unit proficiency?  Will these alternate lifestyles so offend those uniformed souls that good order would be difficult to maintain? 

I can not answer these questions, for I have not worn the uniform for quite some time.  I would ask, however, for a little better timing.  Have we as a nation not placed ample strain on the young families that comprise our military?  These same families have seen as many as three year long deployments to combat zones within a five year period.  These same families suffer the indignity of supporting their children at least partially on food stamps.  And yes, it is these families that endure debilitating injuries and loss of life at such an early age.

Regardless of where one stands on the wars we now conduct, today’s military has endured enough and does not deserve to end up as a pawn in some political game.  Now is not the right time, if there is to be such a time.

Your comments:

therealist says:

Hats off to all our soldiers. Anyone who serves is a hero to me, so much more so than any celebrity or singer ever was.

I never joined the military - preexisting conditions prohibited me from serving as I wished, but I was ready to enlist.

However - I wouldn’t care at all about the sexual orientation of those soldiers next to me. My biggest concerns would be; does this person know what they are doing? Can he or she shoot, drive the tank, or fly the plane? Whether one is gay or straight doesn’t effect how you can run the equipment, load the ordinance, or repair the breakdown.

If I’m in a battle ready to fight, when I look to either side I would rather see two people, straight or gay, than no one at all.

On: 02/03  at  05:12 PM

JimmyBallard says:

9iron: When do you think the time will ever be right? Here is the opinion of a great American who thinks the time is right now:


WASHINGTON (Feb. 3)—Colin Powell, who as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the 1990s led the opposition to letting gays serve openly in the military, said today he had changed his mind.

“In the almost 17 years since the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ legislation was passed, attitudes and circumstances have changed,” the former secretary of state said in a statement. “I fully support the new approach presented to the Senate Armed Services Committee this week by Secretary of Defense (Robert) Gates and Admiral (Michael) Mullen.”

Retired Gen. Colin Powell says he has changed his mind and now believes gays should be able to serve openly in the military.
Powell has been saying for two years that he thought the policy, which was devised as a compromise in 1993 after President Bill Clinton initially proposed lifting the military’s long-standing ban on gays, should be reviewed. But today’s statement was his first unequivocal endorsement of dropping the policy that allows gays and lesbians to serve only if they stay quiet about their sexual orientation.

The turnaround is certain to add more momentum to President Barack Obama’s plan to repeal the policy. It comes a day after Mullen, Powell’s successor as chairman, and Gates told a Senate hearing that it was only a matter of when, not if, the policy would be repealed.

“General Powell has made clear that his position is about effectiveness in the military,” Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese said. “His powerful voice for ending ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ is a tipping point in favor of the brave men and women who are serving our nation in silence.”

Referring to Sen. John McCain of Arizona and other Republicans who still support the policy, Solmonese said: “I want to ask the senators and members who are speaking out against this repeal: What do you know about military effectiveness that General Powell, Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen and the commander in chief don’t know?

“The truth is that there are no more excuses. The death knell for ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ has been rung, and now is the moment to send this law into the history books where it belongs,” he said.

On: 02/04  at  02:40 AM

9iron says:

Mr Ballard,

My point simply with the load our current military carries, I think it a bit risky to be playing political games.  I do believe that it is not the time for political ‘one-upmanship’.  This change goes against the very moral fiber that has been ingrained into our uniformed men and women their entire lives.

These great Americans, for the most part, hail from traditional Americana the vast majority of whom have never experienced alternative lifestyles.  The risk in readiness, retention, and discipline is one that needs to be carefully weighed against the potential gain.

That said, I can think of no good reason for gays
not to openly serve.  Contrary to popular belief, they are there now and have been for quite some time.  It is unfortunate that when they are ‘outed’, expulsion is the result.  They knew the rules going in.

Back in January 1977, then President Jimmy Carter granted amnesty to the draft dodgers of the Viet Nam War which I adamantly opposed.  The result was a hollow army for some three and one-half years exemplified by the Iranian Hostage Crisis which ultimately jaded his presidency.  As the years passed, I realize that Mr Carter was right in granting that amnesty, but I could not see it at the time.

Timing is my point, conducting two wars in arguably the most God forsaken places on this planet amid an economic turmoil that rivals The Great Depression-Would someone with a little common sense please stand up in Washington!

On: 02/04  at  10:38 AM

hjordan says:

I agree, sexual orientation does not bother me. Soldiers are risking their lives to keep mine safe so gay, straight or bi there my hero and I will not judge them!!!!

On: 02/04  at  10:36 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post New Comment

Most Viewed This Month


Sorry, no results!

Most Commented This Month


Sorry, no results!

Who's Online?


•  No users online.